And the legato thing, that too is an inherent problem with sample-based instruments.Д«enLOL Are you on staff or a publicist or PR person for the 'Physical Modeling Kicks Samplers Butts' Foundation or something. Of course, this is a by-product of sampling limitations.

For good reason, too.they just cannot do justice to an instrument like an accurate and detailed implementation of reactive/physical synthesis can -) In just a few years time all these sample libraries will be covered under an inch of dust. Reactive/physical synthesis is the thing of the future. I find that even with keyboards like pianos, organs, e-pianos, samples are not an optimal solution in those cases either, so that should establish my argument. I'm not a fan of samples in general, and ESPECIALLY with instruments as expressive as those involving strings like basses and guitars, violins, cellos and of course, woodwind, brass and saxophone instruments. That, my friend, is the benefit of physical/behavioural/reactive synthesis/modeling. The exception to this is, of course, Samplemodeling, which are VERY good because they use a sophisticated technology that can 'morph' and phase-align the harmonic structures of the samples and synthesise the portamento/legato and vibrato characteristics of the sound).ДЄfter using WIVI/Samplemodeling and then comparing with ordinary sampled sax, you won't ever want to go back, believe me, you won't. Think about WIVI for example, there is very few problems with reproducing the sounds of a saxophone, for example, because it uses sophisticated behavioural modeling, so it reacts to your playing.Д¬ompare this with ordinary sampled saxophones. This is why physical modeling is going to revolutionise virtual instruments. While there are some work-arounds for these issues, they will not always work the way you want them to.

And the legato thing, that too is an inherent problem with sample-based instruments. On the whole, I'm preferring most patches without any RR.Of course, this is a by-product of sampling limitations. Not so much a jump in volume, but a jump in tone - from dark to bright. I've already saved some great electric and acoustic multis using key switching set just the way I like it. By flicking through the Thinning settings I can usually get rid of it, but I don't really know why or how yet.ДЄlso, do notes that are usually played as open strings always have to be open strings, or can I somehow choose to play A on the E string or G on the A string? Other times when playing a muted sound, you try and 'pull off' or 'hammer on' a note, (which is essentially what legato is) and the sound that hammers on is a much louder un-muted sample. The legato features, for example sometimes they don't seem to work as expected, but maybe this is Trilian deciding that you can't do certain things like going from open string A down to a G.

I've spent most of the day today messing around with Trilian and there's still things I don't quite get. On the whole, I'm preferring most patches without any RR. Moonwalker on VimeoIt was the Retro 60's electric bass. Personally i love RR and never had that effect that some notes would jump in volume. If you dont want the round robin you can switch it off in the system settings of Trilian.

Trilian bass hammer ons and pull offs